Sunday, January 4, 2015

Arminius Objection

       You will say to me then, "why does He still find fault?
        For who has resisted His will? But indeed, O man,
                    who are you to reply against God?
                                   ( Rom.9:19-20a )


     Just as the teachings of Augustine and Luther drew objections,
Calvin's theology  sparked opposition. His  most virulent critic was
Jacob Arminus, a  Dutch  scholar who lived a generation later. He
and his followers took great exception to Calvin's teaching on the
human will, seeing in it a serious slight to God's justice.
      Aminus is something portrayed as an unconstructed Pelagian,
but he agreed substantially with Augustine, Luther, and Calvin. For
instance, he taught that the Fall radically  affected  all dimension of
human nature, leaving man in a state of spiritual death thst renders
him morally unable to  do any  good  unless  first liberated by God. 
He referred  to the  liberating  grace  of God as " prevenient grace," 
or  the  grace  that  comes  before  conversion.  And  he  began to 
diverge from orthodox teaching when he said all ungenerate people 
have a freedom of the will by which they ate capable of resisting the 
Holy Spirit. In others words, grace is necessary to liberty the human 
heart, but people can say no to it. As he put it, grace is sufficient to 
convert  a  person; it is all  the  person  needs to be  freed  from his 
bondage  to  sin. But  grace  is  not  inherently  efficient; it does not 
always effect conversion.
      What was Aminius' basis for this teaching? Like Pelagius long
before him, he was concrened that the Reformed doctrine of pre-
destination would cast a shadow on the justice of God. He though
that if God  gives  grace  only  to  some,  He gets the credit for the
salvation  of those  who  do not. So Aminius  left man with a small
Reservoir of  ability by  which  he  could  reject  grace  and  hence 
incure the blame for his damnation.
      Calvinism agreed that God should get the credit for salvation,
for fallen  man cannot choose. Him  unless  He  first regenerates 
the spirit. But God does not desrve the blame for the damnation of
the unrependant. They are guilty because of the fall and their own
sin, and theirs; they are receiving the justice they deserve."Is there
unrighteousness  with  God?  Certainly  not!" Thus,  in  1618, the 
Objectives of Aminuis' followers' were denounce and the five points
Calvinism were formulated as an outline of the biblical view.
      Like Pelagius, Aminius allowed his notion that predestination 
makes God look bad to lead him into error.  We cannot form our 
belief this way.  We must study scripture and take what it says at 
face value. Even though it may be hard to accept or to understand.
Ask God to gives you a heart eager to hear and willing  to believe
His truth.

No comments:

Post a Comment