So also by one man's obedience many will be made righteous
(Roman 5: 19).
Our study of human free will is, in a sense, a study of doctrine of
original sin. "Original sin" does not refer to the first sin Adam and Eve's
eating of the Forbidden fruit, the event known in redemptive history
as the fall of man but to the results of that sin. Virtually no one disputes
that the fall occured. But there has been and continues to be great
controversy over the extent to which the human race was corrupted
by our first parents' sin.
This controversy erupted in a major way early in the fifth century.
In his Confessions, Saint Augustine published a prayer: "Give me the
grace to do as you command, and command me to do what you will!"
He was asking for divine enabling to do whatever God might command
Him to do. But a British monk named Pelagius took exception to the
underlying theology in Augustine's prayer. A zealot for righteousness,
he agreed that God had the right to command his creatures.
But Pelagius felt that a just God would not and could not command a
Creature to do something the creature lacked power to do. To him, the
Idea that man requires divine help to do his duty the idea expressed in
Augustine's prayer was repugnant. He believe that idea cast a shadow
on the righteousness of God. And so his dispute with Augustine became
A controversy over the Fall and its effects.
Pelagius did not deny that Adam sinned. But he believe Adam
had been created with the power to obey or disobey God. Futhermore,
Adam's sin did not radically after his nature he retained a will that was
free to choose obedience. His sin make it harder for him to do so, but
not impossible. In Pelagius' view, all of Adam's decendants, far from
being plunged into a state of moral corruption by his sin, are born in the
same moral condition in which adam was created with power to obey
or disobey. Thus, while affected by sin, mankind is good at the core.
And while grace assists obedience, it is not necessary. People can live
perfect lives, and many have.
As we will see, Augustine disputed Pelagius because his view made
divine grace non-essential. That in turn made the whole concept of a
redeemer superfluous. Thus, Pelagius' teaching was not just an eso-
teric theological point of view; it was an attack on the Gospel itself.
Pelagius affirmed that man can live a life acceptable to God under
his own power. But the Bible proclaims that an essential step in our
salvation is the realization that we cannot save ourselves. Have You
reached this understanding? If not, continue to examine the scriptures
as we stady this issue. If so, praise God for redeeming you.
No comments:
Post a Comment